lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
From
Date
  Darren,

On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 18:30 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> Following Ingo's example I have included the modified test case (please see
> the original mail for librt.h) that starts the trace before each sleep and
> disables it after we wake up. If we have missed a period, we print the
> trace.
>

Your test program fails (at least on my box) as the overhead of
starting and stopping the trace in the 5 ms period is just too high.

By moving the latency_trace_start() at the start of the thread
function and latency_trace_stop() at the end, everything runs fine.
I did not have any period missed even under heavy load.

Sébastien.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-18 10:42    [W:0.063 / U:7.200 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site