lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] don't use flush_tlb_all in suspend time
Hi!

> > > In which case, how's about this?
> >
> > Certainly better, I'd say.
> >
> > > @@ -420,7 +421,14 @@ void zap_low_mappings (void)
> > > #else
> > > set_pgd(swapper_pg_dir+i, __pgd(0));
> > > #endif
> > > - if (cpus_weight(cpu_online_map) == 1)
> > > + /*
> > > + * We can be called at suspend/resume time, with local interrupts
> > > + * disabled. But flush_tlb_all() requires that local interrupts be
> > > + * enabled.
> > > + *
> > > + * Happily, the APs are not yet started, so we can use local_flush_tlb() * in that case
> > > + */
> > > + if (num_online_cpus() == 1)
> > > local_flush_tlb();
> > > else
> > > flush_tlb_all();
> >
> > But this still scares. It means calling convention is "may enable
> > interrupts with >1 cpu, may not with == 1 cpu".
> Below patch should make things clean. How do you think?

Nice...

Could we perhaps reuse swsusp_pg_dir (just make it used for swsusp &
suspend-to-ram) to save a bit more code? It is in arch/i386/mm/init.c
.

Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-18 10:35    [W:0.064 / U:7.820 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site