Messages in this thread | | | From | John Kelly <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction | Date | Thu, 18 May 2006 15:23:20 -0400 |
| |
On Thu, 18 May 2006 10:34:30 -0700, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>I see two ways of justifying a mainline merge of things such as this
>a) We make an up-front decision that Linux _will_ have OS-virtualisation > capability in the future
After using OpenVZ for a short time, I wonder how I ever managed without it. For application development and testing, having a little sandbox with only a few PIDs running makes it easier to debug things.
> and just start putting in place the pieces for that, even if some > of them are not immediately useful. I suspect that'd be acceptable, > although I worry that we'd get partway through and some issues would > come up which are irreconcilable amongst the various groups.
From a user's POV, I want it ASAP. As for conflicts, why not cross that bridge when you come to it?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |