[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
>Three instructions?  We might be still able to afford that.
>push/pop is probably not needed because the stack frame will be already
>set up (ok possibly after a few instructions, but a small window might be

Okay, then I'll prepare a patch to that effect during the next couple of days.

>Maybe I'm dense but I still don't get - frame has a pt_regs so why
>isn't the caller allowed to know about that fact?

Because the fact that there is a regs fields and the PC is accessible through it is architecture specific, yet the
caller (kernel/unwind.c) ought to be architecture independent.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-18 14:05    [W:0.038 / U:8.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site