[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFT] major libata update
Albert Lee wrote:
>> To sum up, it happens when the master slot is occupied by an ATAPI
>> device and the corresponding slave slot is empty. The slave slot
>> reports ATAPI signature (probably duplicated from the master) and passes
>> all legacy presence test thus resulting in timeout on IDENTIFY.
> This problem was seen with PATA Promise 20275 adapter + IBM DVD-RAM drive.
> Single master device configuration, no slave device.
> The master device acts as slave and creates a phantom slave device.
> (
> The problem was later fixed by Tejun's ata_exec_internal() patch:
> (
> After the patch, the phantom device is finally detected by ata_dev_identify().
> Libata uses polling PIO for IDENTIFY DEVICE before this major update.
> The polling PIO finds something wrong when it reads a 0x00 device status.
> So, the phantom device is detected quite quickly.
> With irq-driven PIO, maybe the phantom device is only detected after time-out.
> So it takes longer (30 secs) to detect the phantom device.
> No good idea how to fix this. Maybe read more registers to see whether the
> phantom device can be detected early before the IDENTIFY DEVICE.

Does the Promise controller show the ghosting problem again with the
recent updates? ata_piix can be fixed by using PCS present bits. I
don't know about Promise though.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-18 13:35    [W:0.090 / U:11.964 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site