lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Document futex PI design

On Mon, 15 May 2006, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Sat, 13 May 2006, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
>
> > > +
> > > +
> > > +1) Has owner that is pending
> > > +----------------------------
> > * insert blank line to be consistent
> >
>
> I didn't see this comment before. I purposely didn't add a blank line
> here, because it's not a new section. It's an index for the three cases
> that can happen. I didn't want to add the two blank lines so that people
> notice that its an index, but I still used the '-' to make it stand out.
>
> Have another idea on how to make these three stand out without making them
> look like new sections?
>
> Should I put a two or three space indent for the three?
>

Oh, damn, I just notice that 1) didn't have a blank line at all and that
is what you were talking about. OK, will add, but I still like the
indentation better, so I'm glad I misunderstood you ;)

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-15 11:12    [W:0.092 / U:0.416 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site