[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86 NUMA panic compile error

    > I think you are right: there are very few end users running with
    > CONFIG_NUMA on normal x86. But, there is a disproportionately large
    > number of developers who do it. There are quite a few IBM (and maybe
    > more via OSDL) developers who's only access to real NUMA hardware is x86
    > NUMAQs and Summit machines. When somebody says "foo is broken on NUMA",
    > I go right to an x86 box.
    > Anyway, I'd like to think that we've contributed enough to the generic
    > NUMA code to have earned our keep and allow our little x86 NUMA "hacks"
    > to remain.

    Yes that is why i did the "only work on Summit" patch as compromise.
    With that you can have your hacks, but it won't impact anybody else.

    > x86 is a legacy architecture now anyway, right? ;)
    I wish everybody would agree on that @)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-15 21:14    [W:0.020 / U:465.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site