[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -rt] scheduling while atomic in fs/file.c

On Mon, 15 May 2006, Daniel Walker wrote:

> Why would it be a problem if the timer moved ? Or the work queue? both
> are protected under a spinlock which is consistently held .

fine, but the patch is still wrong. If it really doesn't matter
which one it's on, instead of moving the put, just get the cpu var with
per_cpu(fdtable_defer_list, raw_smp_processor_id()) and get rid of the put


Didn't John have a patch that did something with get_percpu_var() that
made this simple?

-- Steve

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-15 16:08    [W:0.051 / U:0.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site