Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Ingo Oeser <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm] update comment in rtmutex.c and friends | Date | Sun, 14 May 2006 17:28:03 +0200 |
| |
Hi Steven,
On Sunday, 14. May 2006 01:34, Steven Rostedt wrote: > @@ -46,9 +46,15 @@ > * > * The fast atomic compare exchange based acquire and release is only > * possible when bit 0 and 1 of lock->owner are 0. > + * > + * (*) There's a small time where the owner can be NULL and the > + * "lock has waiters" bit is set. This can happen when grabbing the lock. > + * To prevent a cmpxchg of the owner releasing the lock, we need to set this > + * bit before looking at the lock, hence the reason this is a transitional > + * state. > */ > > -static void > +static vid
Typo here.
> rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner, > unsigned long mask) > { > @@ -365,6 +371,7 @@ static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct r
PS: Compile testing ANY changes to *.c and *.h files will catch most obvious brown paper bag typos for you :-)
Regards
Ingo Oeser - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |