Messages in this thread | | | From | Keir Fraser <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 23/35] Increase x86 interrupt vector range | Date | Sun, 14 May 2006 08:52:24 +0100 |
| |
On 13 May 2006, at 18:44, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> AFAIC this could go in anytime. It's simple, self-contained and makes > sense even without Xen. > > One minor nit: the IRQ value isn't negated, it's complemented. The > comments need to be fixed.
If we really want it disambiguated then we should call it something like 'bitwise-negated' or 'ones-complemented'. 'Complemented' alone is worse than 'negated' imo, since negation is at least the usual name for the tilde operator in C while complementation is an ambiguous term unless you know the base/radix.
-- Keir
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |