lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.17-rc3 - fs/namespace.c issue
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 10:53 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 14:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > There seems to have been a bug introduced in this changeset:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f6422f17d3a480f21917a3895e2a46b968f56a08
> > > > >
> > > > > Am running 2.6.17-rc3-mm1. When this changeset is applied, 'mount --bind'
> > > > > misbehaves:
> > > > >
> > > > > > # mkdir /foo
> > > > > > # mount -t tmpfs -o rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,noatime,nodiratime none /foo
> > > > > > # mkdir /foo/bar
> > > > > > # mount --bind /foo/bar /foo
> > > > > > # tail -2 /proc/mounts
> > > > > > none /foo tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,noatime,nodiratime 0 0
> > > > > > none /foo tmpfs rw 0 0
> > > > >
> > > > > Reverting this changeset causes both mounts to have the same options.
> > > > >
> > > > > (Thanks to Stephen Smalley for tracking down the changeset...)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > (cc's added)
> > >
> > > What's the verdict on this change in user-visible behavior for bind
> > > mounts? Is it a legitimate change and userland just needs to adapt to
> > > it, or is it a change to the kernel's stable ABI that needs to be
> > > reverted? It still appears to be present in -rc4.
> > >
> >
> > Well. We'd certainly prefer to not change user-visible behaviour without
> > excellent reasons - I don't htink any have been given, really.
> >
> > AFACIT nobody tested Herbert's 'untested "fix"'. What was the verdict on
> > that?
>
> The untested 'fix' makes the rest of the patch pointless (no point in
> passing the mnt_flags if we aren't going to use them). Might as well
> just revert the patch altogether.

OK, I queued a revert. It seems to be the sanest thing to do at this time
- Herbert can have another go later..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-12 20:14    [W:0.066 / U:0.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site