Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 May 2006 15:31:29 -0700 (PDT) | Subject | Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:10:24 +0100
> But that's the argument in favour of using diff, not shutting the > bogus warnings up...
IMHO, the tree should build with -Werror without exception. Once you have that basis, new ones will not show up easily and the hard part of the battle has been won.
Yes, people will post a lot of bogus versions of warning fixes, but we're already good at flaming those off already :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |