lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: RT task scheduling

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> * Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote:
>
> > I'm quite aware of what you're saying as well as a much of the
> > contents of the -rt patch. Please don't assume that I'm not aware of
> > this. The -rt patch doesn't do SWSRPS, [...]
>
> to the contrary, the "RT overload" code in the -rt tree does strict,
> system-wide RT priority scheduling. That's the whole point of it.

so after this "clarification of terminology" i hope you are in picture
now, so could you please explain to me what you meant by:

> > You should consider for a moment to allow for the binding of a
> > thread to a CPU to determine the behavior of a SCHED_FIFO class task
> > instead of creating a new run category. [...]

to me it still makes no sense, and much of the followups were based on
this. Or were you simply confused about what the scheduling code in -rt
does precisely? Did that get clarified now?

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-08 09:30    [W:0.120 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site