[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RT task scheduling
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:51:41PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> no, i'm discussing precisely the point you raised:

Oh boy.

> >>> You should consider for a moment to allow for the binding of a
> >>> thread to a CPU to determine the behavior of a SCHED_FIFO class task
> >>> instead of creating a new run category. [...]
> with the observation that 1) binding is already possible [so your
> suggestion is apparently knocking on open doors] 2) binding is a
> separate mechanism (not adequate for all workloads) and it is thus
> orthogonal to what i'm trying to achieve with the "RT overload" stuff.
> Really simple and straightforward observations i think.

This is going to take some time to get the terminology right. It's
late now and I'll have to continue this tomorrow.

First thing's first, SCHED_FIFO_GLOBAL for what you want in the main
line is the same thing as SCHED_FIFO in -rt, right ?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-07 13:17    [W:0.069 / U:3.956 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site