lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] generic clocksource updates
Hi,

On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> > Currently this field isn't needed and as soon we have a need for it, we
> > can add proper capability information.
>
> Is there a reason, why requirements which are known from existing
> experience must be discarded to be reintroduced later ?

Then please explain these requirements.
This field shouldn't have been added in first place, I guess I managed to
confuse John when I talked about handling of continuous vs. tick based
clocks. Currently no user should even care about this, it's an
implementation detail of the clock.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-07 22:46    [W:0.083 / U:4.880 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site