lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [patch 2.6.16-mm2 10/9] sched throttle tree extract - kill interactive task feedback loop
Date
On Thursday 06 April 2006 14:10, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 09:15 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 April 2006 03:38, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > - if (!rt_task(next) && interactive_sleep(next->sleep_type)) {
> > > + if (!TASK_INTERACTIVE(next) && interactive_sleep(next->sleep_type)) {
> >
> > You can't remove that rt_task check from there can you? We shouldn't ever
> > requeue a rt task.
>
> RT tasks are always interactive aren't they? (I'll check)

No, they're always equal to their static_prio. This rt_task check was added
originally because it was found to inappropriately be requeueing SCHED_FIFO
tasks.

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-06 06:32    [W:0.612 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site