lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH 0/9] CPU controller
>>>I'm also pretty sure, that CPU controller based on timeslice tricks 
>>>behaves poorly on burstable load patterns as well and with interactive
>>>tasks. So before commiting I propose to perform a good testing on
>>>different load patterns.
>>
>>Yes, it can only react very slowly.
>
>
> Actually, this might not be that much of a problem. I know I can
> traverse queue heads periodically very cheaply. Traversing both active
> and expired arrays to requeue starving tasks once every 100ms costs max
> 4usecs (3GHz P4) for a typical distribution.

with fair scheduling with can be a big problem, as tasks working less
then a tick are hard to account :/

Thanks,
Kirill


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-28 10:08    [W:0.038 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site