lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectPCI init vs. memory init
From

Paul,

I'd previously reported a problem where the PCI subsystem
was getting inited before the memory subsystem. In the unusual
case of an EEH failure, this resulted in a crash in kmalloc,
which I hacked around with a if(!mem_init_done).
You mentioned that the sequence of inits seemed wrong, that the
PCI init should be done later, after the memory init. I think
I agree; but when I took a very very quick look at the code, there
was no obvious hook in later init to move the PCI init over to.

Are you pursuing this further? Should I dig into it? Any bright
ideas? Am I missing something obvious?

There are several spots in in the powerpc PCI init code where
a boot_mem alloc is used instead of kmalloc, and this boot_mem is
then hacked around in the case of a PCI hotplug remove. It would
be nice to fix this...

--linas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-29 01:06    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean