lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: make O="<dir>" install; output not relocated; 2.6.16.11(kbuild)
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> The modules_install target uses O= for its _input_ files (that is,
> for the readily compiled modules) and outputs to
> $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH)/lib/modules/$VERSION/ . So you may want to set
> $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH) in the same way as you've set V= or O= before.
>
> If you're trying to prepare something to be copied over to a target
> system, the tar-pkg, targz-pkg and tarbz2-pkg targets may be exactly
> what you're searching for.
>
Quite possibly. What about an installed kernel (apart from the
modules)? Will the kernel image and map, etc, get installed into
the "INSTALL_MOD_PATH" as well? It doesn't sound, intuitively,
to be so from the environment variable name.
> It's maybe a bit misleading, but `modules_install' isn't a compilation
> run, it's an installation run. O= was ment to hold all
> compiled/generated objects, but to have a working installation, you
> need to break out of that (or have INSTALL_MOD_PATH set.)
>
---
Fair enough, but I'm more interested in where to specify
the target location of the installed kernel and System.map as
I don't always have modules for a generated kernel, but usually
(near 100% :-)) have an installable kernel image. For development,
I could see it being useful to mount the target system's root in
a local directory (like /mnt), then have the kernel build install
to a target root of "/mnt".

Tnx,
Linda



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-28 19:06    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans