Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:28:14 +0300 (EEST) | From | Pekka J Enberg <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] likely cleanup: remove unlikely for kfree(NULL) |
| |
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Nick Piggin wrote: > Not to dispute your conclusions or method, but I think doing a > defconfig or your personal config might be more representative > of % size increase of text that will actually be executed. And > that is the expensive type of text.
True but I was under the impression that Arjan thought we'd get text savings with GCC 4.1 by making kfree() inline.
Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |