lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] utsname namespaces: sysctl hack
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:

>>>Can we please suggest a syscall interface?
>>>
>>>
>
>Eric,
>
>Did you have any ideas for how you'd want to interface to look? Are
>you fine with the vserver approach?
>
>

Eric has said that his understanding was that syscall switches (ie,
syscalls with subcommands) were bad form.

I understand the concern, but I think while it's still in prototype
stages, that it's a sensible and pragmatic approach. Once individual
subcommands are "finalised" then they can be split out into a seperate
syscall, and any level of backwards compatibility can be maintained by
whoever needs it.

>>What was wrong with the method of the one I posted / extracted from the
>>Linux-VServer project? I mean, apart from the baggage which I intend to
>>remove for the next posting.
>>
>>
>
>Are you working on a next posting?
>
>

I've been a bit backlogged of late. I'll put some time towards it this
week, of course patches are always welcome and will find a home on utsl :).

Sam.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-26 06:11    [W:0.136 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site