Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview | From | James Carter <> | Date | Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:50:03 -0400 |
| |
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 14:43 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tuesday 25 April 2006 14:42, James Carter wrote: > > > I talk to one of the unconfined people at the table and ask them to > > rename the "knife" to "spoon". Now I am free to do what I wish. > > That assumes that your jail allows talking to other people. > > > You don't care about the name "knife", you care about the object it > > represents. > > In the apparmor model you only care about what the application is allowed > to do. If it does anything extraordinary like trying to talk to people it > shouldn't talk to it gets a veto.
IIUC Apparmor does not confine IPC, so it can't stop an application from talking to one it shouldn't.
-- James Carter <jwcart2@epoch.ncsc.mil> National Security Agency
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |