Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: kfree(NULL) | From | Daniel Walker <> | Date | Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:58:38 -0700 |
| |
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 15:53 -0700, Hua Zhong wrote: > > struct likeliness { > > char *file; > > int line; > > atomic_t true_count; > > atomic_t false_count; > > struct likeliness *next; > > }; > > It seems including atomic.h inside compiler.h is a bit tricky (might have interdependency). > > Can we just live with int instead of atomic_t? We don't really care about losing a count occasionally..
It's nice so you don't have to fool around with locking .. The atomic_t structure is pretty simple thought . I think it boils down to just an int anyway .
Daniel
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |