lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: kfree(NULL)
2006/4/21, Vernon Mauery <vernux@us.ibm.com>:

> Maybe kfree should really be a wrapper around __kfree which does the real
> work. Then kfree could be a inlined function or a #define that does the NULL
> pointer check.

NULL pointer check in kfree saves lot of small code fragments in callers.
It is one of many reasons why kfree does it.
Making kfree inline wrapper eliminates this save.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-21 16:10    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans