lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] smpnice: don't consider sched groups which are lightly loaded for balancing
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:49:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > updated patch appended. thanks.
>
> Where are we up to with smpnice now? Are there still any known
> regressions/problems/bugs/etc? Has sufficient testing been done for us to
> know this?

Based on the code review, so far I have been giving load balancing examples
which break. Peter is also plannning to fix outstanding issues which are open.

In the coming days, we are planning to run some benchmarks.

Nick, it will be great if you can review and provide your feedback.

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-21 02:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans