lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview
Quoting grundig (grundig@teleline.es):
> El Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:32:30 -0700,
> Crispin Cowan <crispin@novell.com> escribi?:
>
> > Our controls on changing the name space have rather poor granularity at
> > the moment. We hope to improve that over time, and especially if LSM
> > evolves to permit it. This is ok, because as Andi pointed out, there are
> > currently few applications using name spaces, so we have time to improve
> > the granularity.
>
> Wouldn't have more sense to improve it and then submit it instead of the
> contrary? At least is the rule which AFAIK is applied to every feature
> going in the kernel, specially when there's an available alternative
> which users can use meanwhile (see reiser4...)

hah, that's funny

When people do that, they are rebuked for not submitting upstream. At
least this way, we can have a discussion about whether the approach
makes sense at all.

-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-20 15:11    [W:0.525 / U:1.956 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site