Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:38:15 -0400 | From | Theodore Ts'o <> | Subject | Re: irqbalance mandatory on SMP kernels? |
| |
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 04:23:14PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > as long as the irqs are spread the apaches will (on average) follow your > irq to the right cpu. Only if you put both irqs on the same cpu you have > an issue
Maybe I'm being stupid but I don't see how the Apache's will follow the IRQ's to the right CPU. I agree this would be a good thing to do, but how does the scheduler accomplish this?
- Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |