Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:31:07 -0700 | From | Crispin Cowan <> | Subject | Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks |
| |
Karl MacMillan wrote: > Which is one reason why SELinux has types (equivalence classes) - it > makes it possible to group large numbers of applications or resources > into the same security category. The targeted policy that ships with > RHEL / Fedora shows how this works in practice. > AppArmor (then called "SubDomain") showed how this worked in practice years before the Targeted Policy came along. The Targeted Policy implements an approximation to the AppArmor security model, but does it with domains and types instead of path names, imposing a substantial cost in ease-of-use on the user.
Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. http://crispincowan.com/~crispin/ Director of Software Engineering, Novell http://novell.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |