lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: irqbalance mandatory on SMP kernels?
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:10:22 +0200
>
> > [jackson:stock]:(/usr/src/linux)$ cat /proc/interrupts
> > CPU0 CPU1
> > 0: 3139568 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
> > 1: 8923 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> > 3: 10 0 IO-APIC-edge serial
> > 4: 37 0 IO-APIC-edge serial
> > 8: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
> > 9: 240 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
> > 12: 75316 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> > 14: 64291 0 IO-APIC-edge ide0
> > 15: 64291 0 IO-APIC-edge ide1
> > 16: 235408 0 IO-APIC-level HiSax, nvidia
> > 17: 15823 0 IO-APIC-level libata, AMD AMD8111
> > 19: 241 0 IO-APIC-level ohci_hcd, ohci_hcd, ohci1394
> > 24: 50761 0 IO-APIC-level eth0
> > NMI: 89 28
> > LOC: 3139042 3139125
> > ERR: 0
> > MIS: 0
> > [jackson:stock]:(/usr/src/linux)$
>
> this may or may not be a problem depending on how long a time you used
> to collect this. Based on your timer tick count it really looks like
> your irq rates are so low that it really doesn't matter much
>
> >
> > Only when firing up the irqbalance util at boot time will activate
> > true SMP, distributing IRQ's across CPU's. Is this on purpose?
> > Because afaik a Linux SMP kernel, 2.4.xx or 2.6.xx should always
> > result in distributed IRQ loads across CPU's.
>
> that is a chipset feature if it happens; not all chipsets do this (and
> most that do, do it badly).
>
> I'm not sure what your actual problem is btw, the irqbalance tool is
> supposed to automatically start at boot, did it not do that ?
> (and no the kernel doesn't need to do everything, something like this
> can perfectly well be done in userspace as irqbalance shows)

My question is if the irqbalance util is really needed to activate IRQ
balancing these days. Which kernel versions and higher (2.4xx and
2.6.xx) do need this tool?

To my understanding can a Linux/UNIX kernel not be called SMP if it
does not activate Symmetric IRQ balancing out of the box. Why was
irqbalance introduced as a tool inside kernel-utils in the 1st place?
In other words: What happened to the Linux kernel that we today now
need a tool called irqbalance ?

Robert
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org stock@stokkie.net

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-17 16:19    [W:0.079 / U:0.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site