lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)


--- Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> You can implement a BSD securelevel model in SELinux
> as far as I can see
> from looking at it,

Well, to seriously mangle quotes,
you can implement any policy you want
with SELinux, so long as Tresys puts
it in.

> and do it better than the code today, so its not
> really a feature drop anyway just a migration away
> from some fossils

Dagnabbit, my scales are showing again.

And y'all are right, In tree users of LSM
are a might thin. Sounds as if those who
would use it need to push to get their code
accepted really hard. That means getting
past the inevitable arguement that "you can
do it with SELinux".


Casey Schaufler
casey@schaufler-ca.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-18 01:29    [W:0.410 / U:0.408 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site