[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Handling devices that don't have a bus
    On Saturday 01 April 2006 8:46 am, Alan Stern wrote:

    > I think you have misunderstood my point. Yes, devices are part of the
    > platform bus only if they explicitly want to be. My point was that even
    > though they _do_ want to be on the platform bus,

    I'm not clear on why it would want to be on the platform bus;
    what would its inner platform-ness consist of?

    There really isn't a "bus" that makes much sense for such a
    singleton device to sit on.

    > in this situation they
    > _can't_ because they are forced to register a struct device, not a struct
    > platform_device. The choice is not up to the driver; it is determined by
    > the USB Gadget framework.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-04-03 14:19    [W:0.024 / U:0.592 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site