[lkml]   [2006]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Handling devices that don't have a bus
On Saturday 01 April 2006 8:46 am, Alan Stern wrote:

> I think you have misunderstood my point. Yes, devices are part of the
> platform bus only if they explicitly want to be. My point was that even
> though they _do_ want to be on the platform bus,

I'm not clear on why it would want to be on the platform bus;
what would its inner platform-ness consist of?

There really isn't a "bus" that makes much sense for such a
singleton device to sit on.

> in this situation they
> _can't_ because they are forced to register a struct device, not a struct
> platform_device. The choice is not up to the driver; it is determined by
> the USB Gadget framework.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-04-03 14:19    [W:0.039 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site