[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectFWIW: Re: SMP and 101% cpu max?
    FYI, running/compiling on a 2x(1GHzxP-III), 1GB
    times for "make" -jn bzImage (no modules):
    (using export TIMEFORMAT="%2Rsec %2Uusr %2Ssys (%P%% cpu)" )

    -j1: 815.80sec 745.64usr 78.74sys (100.00% cpu)
    -j2: 445.17sec 778.68usr 86.22sys (100.00% cpu)
    -j3: 444.89sec 781.66usr 87.84sys (100.00% cpu)
    -j4: 443.08sec 781.81usr 87.97sys (100.00% cpu)
    -j5: 445.98sec 782.53usr 87.51sys (100.00% cpu)

    I am not seeing the symptom you are describing. The load
    increases proportionately to the 'job limit', but it doesn't
    radically change the overall cpu required. As I have
    only 2 cpu's, I can't expect much benefit beyond 2x, with
    actual approaching closer to 1.8x.


    Jesper Juhl wrote:
    > On 3/7/06, Magnus Damm <> wrote:
    >> With 128MB and 256MB configurations, a majority of the tests never
    >> make it over 101% CPU usage when I run "make -j 2 bzImage", building a
    >> allnoconfig kernel. With 64MB memory, everything seems to be working
    >> as expected. Also, running "make bzImage" works as expected too.
    > Hmm, I wonder if it's related to the problem I reported here :
    > Where I need to run make -j 5 or higher to load both cores of my Athlon X2.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-08 03:53    [W:0.019 / U:27.460 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site