Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 04 Mar 2006 21:36:54 +0100 | From | Patrick McHardy <> | Subject | Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL |
| |
jamal wrote: > On Sat, 2006-04-03 at 17:56 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>Adrian Bunk wrote: >> >>>This option should IMHO no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL. >>> >> >>Yesterday I managed to crash my machine playing around with tc actions >>within minutes. I haven't looked into it yet, but it seems it still >>needs more testing. > > > Simple: Fix the bug and submit a patch. If you cant find the cause post > what you are doing.
I'll fix it.
> What is the metric for going from experimental to non-experimental? > I surely hope it doesnt come to some irrational reasoning like > "Patrick found a bug"[1].
I think a sane metric is "opinion of people who know the code". But I don't care much, I don't think many people care whether something is maked experimental or not.
> [1]If you used half of that logic on netfilter it would still be > experimental or rather should be demoted to experimental.
I'll take that as a compliment :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |