[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Synchronizing Bit operations V2
    Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
    > Christoph Lameter wrote on Thursday, March 30, 2006 6:38 PM
    >>>>Neither one is correct because there will always be one combination of
    >>>>clear_bit with these macros that does not generate the required memory
    >>>Can you give an example? Which combination?
    >>For Option(1)
    > Sorry, you totally lost me. It could me I'm extremely slow today. For
    > option (1), on ia64, clear_bit has release semantic already. The comb
    > of __before_clear_bit + clear_bit provides the required ordering. Did
    > I miss something? By the way, we are talking about detail implementation
    > on one specific architecture. Not some generic concept that clear_bit
    > has no ordering stuff in there.

    The memory ordering that above combination should produce is a
    Linux style smp_mb before the clear_bit. Not a release.

    SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
    Send instant messages to your online friends

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-31 07:47    [W:0.023 / U:9.344 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site