lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/9] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem
On 3/31/06, Ingo Oeser <netdev@axxeo.de> wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Fair, but wouldn't it be better to have the association per client.
> >
> > Maybe leave the one as a summary and have a dir per client with
> > similar stats that are for each client and add a per channel summary
> > at the top level as well.
> Such level of detail really belongs to debugging, IMHO.
[snip]

If we implemented more stats then yes debugfs sounds like it might be
the way to go.

> BTW: What is the actual frequency, at which such counters
> will be incremented?

Currently the code updates these variables (kept per cpu) every time a
copy is queued. See include/linux/dmaengine.h.

-- Andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-31 22:07    [W:0.073 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site