[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][RFC] splice support
    Jens Axboe <> wrote:
    > > > Right now "flags" doesn't do anything at all, and you should just pass in
    > > > zero.
    > >
    > > In that case perhaps we should be enforcing flags==0 so that future
    > > flags-using applications will reliably fail on old flags-not-understanding
    > > kernels.
    > >
    > > But that won't work if we later define a bit in flags to mean "behave like
    > > old kernels used to". So perhaps we should require that bits 0-15 of
    > > `flags' be zero and not care about bits 16-31.
    > >
    > > IOW: it might be best to make `flags' just go away, and add new syscalls in
    > > the future as appropriate.
    > Not if flags == 0 maintains the same behaviour. The only flag I can
    > think of right now is the 'move' or 'gift' flag, meaning that the caller
    > wants to migrate pages from the pipe instead of copying them. I'd
    > imagine we'd get that in way before 2.6.17 anyways, so I think we're
    > fine.

    OK.. Do you plan to make it reject unrecognised flags?
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-30 09:33    [W:0.020 / U:1.432 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site