[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [rfc][patch] improved interactive starvation patch against 2.6.16
    On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:

    > You applied the wrong patch. The inlined one was against virgin 2.6.16,
    > for folks to comment on, and the attached was the incremental against
    > the 2.6.16 anti-starvation tree.
    > Ah, your mailer probably showed both as attached. Anyway, here's the
    > incremental again inlined.

    Ah OK, it's not even the mailer, it's me. I read the message and did not
    notice the attachment, just the inline patch. Then I forwarded it to my
    work address and lost the attachment. You know the rest ...

    > (note to self: never include patches for two trees in same message)

    Good advice. Or manually edit the directory name in the diff to
    explicitly show what it refers to. Eg:

    --- linux-2.6.16-sched7/kernel/sched.c 2006-03-27 06:11:01.000000000 +0200
    +++ linux-2.6.16/kernel/sched.c 2006-03-30 10:50:46.000000000 +0200

    Anyway, thanks for your reply, I'll re-apply it and recompile.

    > -Mike


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-30 16:56    [W:0.019 / U:5.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site