lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: AMD64 X2 lost ticks on PM timer
    Date
    On Saturday 04 March 2006 00:46, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > More likely is a disabled interrupt period is longer than a
    > tick period, or similar.

    Then the ticks wouldn't be attributed to idle and softirq.
    They are both special in that they do an unconditional local_irq_enable()
    instead of the usual save/restore.

    -Andi
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-03-04 01:11    [W:0.019 / U:60.396 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site