[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH][RFC] splice support
Jeff Garzik <> wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > The "destination first" convention is insane. It only makes sense for
> > assignments, and these aren't assignments.
> I agree.
> But alas, sendfile(2) is defined as destination first:
> > ssize_t sendfile(int out_fd, int in_fd, off_t *offset, size_t count)
> which begs the question, do we want to be different from sendfile(2),
> and confuse a segment of the programmer populace? :)

strcpy, memcpy...

Obviously copy(from, to) is the sane way to do things, but yeah, I _think_
a C programmer would expect copy(to, from).

I don't think it matters much at all, really. If they get it backwards
they'll notice pretty quickly ;)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-30 03:21    [W:0.164 / U:23.452 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site