[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Virtualization steps
Quoting Kirill Korotaev (
> >>so IMHO, we should make a kernel branch (Eric or Sam
> >>are probably willing to maintain that), which we keep
> >>in-sync with mainline (not necessarily git, but at
> >>least snapshot wise), where we put all the patches
> >>we agree on, and each party should then adjust the
> >>existing solution to this kernel, so we get some deep
> >>testing in the process, and everybody can see if it
> >>'works' for him or not ...
> >
> >ACK. A collection of patches that we can all agree
> >on sounds like something worth aiming for.
> >
> >It looks like Kirill last round of patches can form
> >a nucleus for that. So far I have seem plenty of technical
> >objects but no objections to the general direction.
> yup, I will fix everything and will come with a set of patches for IPC,
> so we could select which way is better to do it :)
> >So agreement appears possible.
> Nice to hear this!
> Eric, we have a GIT repo on already:
> we will create a separate branch also called -acked, where patches
> agreed upon will go.

That's ok by me. If a more neutral name/site were preferred, we could
use the set we had finally gotten around to setting up - (LinuX Containers). Unfortunately that would
likely be just a quilt patch repository.

A wiki + git repository would be ideal.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-28 14:56    [W:0.183 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site