[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] config: Fix CONFIG_LFS option
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 14:34 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >
> > The help text says that if you select CONFIG_LBD, then it will
> > automatically select CONFIG_LFS. Nope... That isn't currently the
> > case.
> I'm not sure your patch makes anything much better, though.
> Why does CONFIG_LSF exist in the first place? Afaik, it only affects a
> totally not-very-interesting thing (blkcnt_t) for a totally not very
> interesting feature (the number of people who want single files >2TB is
> likely not very big).
> Having it auto-selected by LBD sounds insane, since LBD is likely more
> interesting than LSF itsef is. It would make more sense to go the other
> way (have LSF auto-select LBD).

NFSv3 and CIFS are two examples of commonly used filesystems that don't
care a hoot for CONFIG_LBD, but that still want to be able to support
large values for inode->i_blocks.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-29 00:51    [W:0.042 / U:2.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site