[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Devel] Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps

Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Matt Ayres <> writes:
>> I think the Xen guys would disagree with you on this. Xen claims <3% overhead
>> on the XenSource site.
>> Where did you get these figures from? What Xen version did you test? What was
>> your configuration? Did you have kernel debugging enabled? You can't just post
>> numbers without the data to back it up, especially when it conflicts greatly
>> with the Xen developers statements. AFAIK Xen is well on it's way to inclusion
>> into the mainstream kernel.
> It doesn't matter. The proof that Xen has more overhead is trivial
> Xen does more, and Xen clients don't share resources well.

I understand the difference. It was more about Kirill grabbing numbers
out of the air. I actually think the containers and Xen complement each
other very well. As Xen is now based on 2.6.16 (as are both VServer and
OVZ) it makes sense to run a few Xen domains that then in turn run
containers in some scenarios. As far as the last part, Xen doesn't
share resources at all :)

Thank you,
Matt Ayres
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-28 19:07    [W:0.078 / U:1.300 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site