[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: State of userland headers
On Friday 24 March 2006 00:04, Rob Landley wrote:
> You also don't want to run a libc built with newer headers than the kernel
> you're running on, or it'll try to use stuff that isn't there.
> You're saying that the new kernel headers wouldn't be versioned using the
> kernel's release numbers. How do we know what kernel version their feature
> set matches then? (I'm confused. This happens easily...)

That's a tradeoff. You either version the headers just like I did, meaning
that a given version corresponds to a given kernel, but that means you can't
release before all of the archs are fully updated (and not relying on a
single person to do all of the updates is one of the points of the exercise;
and with more people, one can have delays) or you're forced to figure out
some other way to version the headers.

Judge others by their intentions and yourself by your results.
Guy Kawasaki
Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from
time to time that nothing that is worth knowing can be taught.
Oscar Wilde
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-26 15:17    [W:0.179 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site