[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
On Saturday 25 March 2006 05:01, Con Kolivas wrote yet:
> I don't expect that staircase will be better in every single situation.
> However it will be better more often, especially when it counts (like audio
> or video skipping) and far more predictable. All that in 300 lines less
> code :)

I thinks the main difference is those other scheduler improvements.
Some of them are compatible with staircase.
Could you also try a mixed and matched 2.6.16-ck1+mm?

GPG Key id: 0xD1F10BA2
Fingerprint: 96E2 304A B9C4 949A 10A0 9105 9543 0453 D1F1 0BA2

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-25 09:28    [W:0.039 / U:8.504 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site