Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH][0/8] (Targeting 2.6.17) Posix memory locking and balanced mlock-LRU semantic | From | Andi Kleen <> | Date | 24 Mar 2006 15:36:46 +0100 |
| |
"Stone Wang" <pwstone@gmail.com> writes: > mlocked areas. > 2. More consistent LRU semantics in Memory Management. > Mlocked pages is placed on a separate LRU list: Wired List.
If it's mlocked why don't you just called it Mlocked list? Strange jargon makes the patch cooler? Also in meminfo
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |