[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ck] swap prefetching merge plans
jos poortvliet wrote:
> Op donderdag 23 maart 2006 08:04, schreef Con Kolivas:
>>On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 03:53 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>A look at the -mm lineup for 2.6.17:
>>> Still don't have a compelling argument for this, IMO.
> well, the reason i use it is my computer is much more reactive in the morning.
> linux uses to get very slow after a night of not-doing-much except some
> 'sleep 5h && blabla' and cron stuff. in the morning it takes a few HOURS to
> get up and running smoothly. with swap prefetch, it actually feels faster
> compared to a fresh boot. now you can force swap prefetch to start working, i
> use it now and then after some heavy taskts which pulled everything to swap.

I have two issues with this argument (not that I'm trying to say it
couldn't make a difference in your case).

Firstly, swap prefetch actually doesn't handle the midnight updatedb pageout
problem nicely. It doesn't do any prefetching when the pagecache/vfs cache
fills memory (which is what would have to happen for updatedb to push stuff
into swap).

Secondly, with or without swap prefetch, I think we can do a better job of
handling these use-once patterns to begin with.

SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-23 10:00    [W:0.175 / U:5.740 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site