lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: DoS with POSIX file locks?
From
Date
> > > Right.  Um.  I took it out back in March 2003 after enough people
> > > convinced me it wasn't worth trying to account for all the memory
> > > processes use, and the userbeans project would take care of it anyway.
> > > Haha.
> > >
> > > It's hard to fix the accounting. You have to deal with one thread
> > > allocating the lock, and then a different thread freeing it. We never
> > > actually accounted for posix locks (which are the ones we really needed
> > > to!) and on occasion had current->locks go negative, with all kinds of
> > > associated badness.
> >
> > Things look fairly straightforward if the accounting is done in
> > files_struct instead of task_struct.
>
> that's the wrong place; you can send fd's over unix sockets to other
> processes....

POSIX locks have no association with fd's. Only the inode and the
"owner" is relevant, where owner is derived from the files_struct
pointer for local locks.

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-20 14:27    [W:0.204 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site