[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.16-rc6: known regressions (v2)
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 08:57:09PM +0000, Claudio Martins wrote:
> Hi Adrian, Nathan and all,
> If think I might have hit this one!

OK - any hints that might lead us toward a test case?

> I managed to get an oops which showed xfs related functions on the backtrace.
> The process involved was "rm" and the specific stress test was some 32
> paralell kernel builds (each one with "make -j8") on a quad Opteron box with
> a 1 TB xfs filesystem. Preemption was disabled.

> After that the machine was still alive, but an fsck.xfs after a reboot showed
> corruption that I was able to repair with xfs_repair. This was also with an

Hmm, fsck.xfs wont report corruption - did you mean xfs_check?

> almost empty filesystem, hence the similarity with the above bug report.

Well, not sure its the same yet - what was your stack trace & did
repair report inodes with nlink==0?

> I didn't record the oops and output from xfs_repair. I'll update my git tree

Ah, doh.

> tonight, rebuild and retest in hopes to find that oops again.

Great, thanks!


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-19 23:52    [W:0.079 / U:2.852 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site