[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: OOPS: 2.6.16-rc6 cpufreq_conservative
Linus Torvalds <> wrote:
> For me, it made a 4970 byte difference in code size.

That's about the same saving as uninlining first_cpu() and next_cpu()

Anything which iterates across multiple CPUs is cachemiss heaven - I doubt
if this is performance-critical code. Or at least if it is, we have bigger

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-19 21:54    [W:0.086 / U:2.964 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site