Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 18 Mar 2006 05:54:25 -0700 | From | Tom Rini <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.16-rc6-rt7 |
| |
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 11:37:19AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 16:36 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:56:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > i have released the 2.6.16-rc6-rt7 tree, which can be downloaded from > > > the usual place: > > > > > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/ > > > > I was wondering, is it normal for the nanosleep02 and alarm02 LTP tests > > to fail? For sometime I've seen these tests fail from time to time with > > the -RT patch but not the regular kernel. > > The nanosleep02 failure is incorrect due to rounding errors in the test > code. [snip] > This never happens on vanilla, as the nanosleep is rounded to the next > jiffie. -rt has high resolution timers which are delivered accurate, so > the rounding errors of the testcode surface.
Thanks! Any ideas about the alarm02 test?
-- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |